Epstein Secrets

. for instance, in the 19th-century philosophy of Charles Peirce IPei:341, in the writings of contempo- rary philosophers Daniel Dennett [Den91J and Douglas Hofstadter 1110179, I lo1961, in Benjamin Whorl's tj linguistic philosophy and Gregory Bateson's lam 79] systems theory of mind and nature. Bateson spoke of

ogy (except via their obvious role in giving rise to biological phenomena describable via classical physics) remains a subject of debate IAG B IS Quantum "magic" aside, it is also conceivable that building AGI is fundamentally impossible for some other reason we don't understand. Without getting relig

standing? Each summer I go on holiday to escape engineering for a couple of weeks. While away I indulge my passion for reading books by the likes of Douglas Hofstadter, David Deutsch and Stephen Hawking. One book that struck me years ago was Roger Penrose’s The Emperors New Mind. In it, he tackles the question of wh

ou can't put a ‘1’ ina memory location and be sure when you come to read it you will get a ‘1’ back. You have to factor in the possibility of error. Quantum effects can be annoying - requiring us to devise all manner of error checking hardware — but they can also be helpful. Richard Feynman proposed using

nt, for instance, in the 19th-century philosophy of Charles Peirce [Pei34], in the writings of contempo- rary philosophers Daniel Dennett [Den91] and Douglas Hofstadter [Hof79, Hof96], in Benjamin Whorf’s [Who64] linguistic philosophy and Gregory Bateson’s [Bat79] systems theory of mind and nature. Bateson spoke of t

ogy (except via their obvious role in giving rise to biological phenomena describable via classical physics) remains a subject of debate [AGBD* 08]. Quantum “magic” aside, it is also conceivable that building AGI is fundamentally impossible for some other reason we don’t understand. Without getting religi