Epstein Secrets

in's motion to present the probable cause issue. (App. 30). In his Motion to Strike, Edwards assumes positions that are completely at odds with 3 Tonja Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. EFTA00808561 his positions taken in the Fourth District Court of Appeal. He now argues that

that a copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed on the attached service list, via electronic service, this September 28, 2017. /s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 0176737 315 S.E. 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 8 EFTA00808566 SERVICE LIST Jack Sc

regoing was served upon all parties listed on the attached service list, via electronic service, this September 28, 2017. /s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 0176737 315 S.E. 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 8 EFTA00808566 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy De

doctrine is limited to those questions of law that were "actually presented" and "actually decided" on a former appeal. Florida Dep't of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105-06 (Fla. 2001). The doctrine allows the trial court, upon remand from the appellate court, to consider a party's alternative a

CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below via electronic service this September 28, 2017. 9 EFTA00808557 Is/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 0176737 315 S.E. 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 IM SERVICE LIST 10 EFTA00808558

the foregoing was served upon all parties listed below via electronic service this September 28, 2017. 9 EFTA00808557 Is/ Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 0176737 315 S.E. 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 IM SERVICE LIST 10 EFTA00808558

octrine is limited to those questions of law that were "actually presented" and "actually decided" on a former appeal." Florida Dep't of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105-06 (Fla. 2001). The doctrine allows the trial court upon remand from the appellate court to consider a party's alternative arg

r Scott Rothstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 O1 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 5315 SE 7th Street., Ste. 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 ttorneys or e rey pstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. FARMER, JAFF

n appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings." Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So.2d 101, 105-06 (Fla. 2001) (citing Greene v. Massey, 384 So.2d 24, 28 (Fla. 1980) ("All points of law which have been adjudicated become th

rejected it and approved this Court's ruling on that issue, and "the facts on which this decision [was] based continue to be the facts of the case." Juliano, 801 So.2d at 106. Therefore, the law of the case doctrine binds this Court to follow the Fourth District's holding (and therefore this Court's pri