Epstein Secrets

rein. 5 EFTA00206524 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2011 Page 6 of 6 DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFT

ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec

rein. 5 EFTA00212197 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2011 Page 6 of 6 DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFT

ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec

rein. 5 EFTA00612480 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2011 Page 6 of 6 DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. C7I -71tS ) 7S c't LINNEA R. JO N UNITED STAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel

ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec

rein. 5 EFTA00615541 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2011 Page 6 of 6 DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. C7I -71tS ) 7S c't LINNEA R. JO N UNITED STAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel

ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec

rein. 5 EFTA00222325 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2011 Page 6 of 6 DONE AND ORDERED this January 5, 2011, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 6 N EFT

ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec

cket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures requited under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(eXI)(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00230163 Case 9:

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

cket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. The parties shall make to each other the disclosures requited under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(aXI)(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p