Document Mentions (4 shared documents)

DOJ-FL-HOLD-159

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

from the nature of their institution,’ powers ‘which cannot be dispensed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the. exercise of all others.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991). “There can be no question ofthe inherent power of a court ‘to protect itself, and hence society, as an instru

before the court; (b) Determining whether the witness is guilty of peijury; or (c) Furthering justice.” Fla. Stat. § 905.27(l)(a)-(c). The Florida 2 The Florida Supreme Court has similarly confirmed that grand jury secrecy is not absolute and that any “harm to public officeholders [from disclosure] will be the product of t

EFTA00728574

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

8-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03'03'2010 Page 10 of 10 (c) The remainder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3id day of March, 2010. te r "- KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: A

ice of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turk

EFTA01734466

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

8-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2010 Page 10 of 10 (c) The remainder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All coun