Epstein Secrets

from the nature of their institution,’ powers ‘which cannot be dispensed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the. exercise of all others.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991). “There can be no question ofthe inherent power of a court ‘to protect itself, and hence society, as an instru

ndants’ Motions to Dismiss were heard on June 3, 2020. While this “case is assigned to Division AG, which is currently presided over by the Honorable Donald Hafele ... ”, Chief Judge ofthe Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, [Hon. Krista Marx] presided over the June 3, 2020 hearing on the State Attorney and Clerk’s Moti

claim of Fifth Amendment privilege and must be responded to within fifteen (15) days from the date hereof. DONE AND ORDERED this August 4, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHIJ2UN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record 22 E

COLORADO BURtvtAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLY YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP December 9, 2009 BY HAND DELIVERY Judge Donald Hafele Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Palm Beach Conn Courthouse Re: acember 14, 2009 UMC Hearing v. Jeffrey Epstein CASE NO.: 502008CA037319)OOOCMB AM A

. Courts also have the inherent power to sanction a party for misconduct. Chambers v. Nasco, 501 U.S. 32, 42 (1991). As the Supreme Court stated in Chambers, "[i]t has long been understood that certain implied powers must necessarily result to our courts of justice from the nature of their institution, p

VENTS 20. On November 1, 2017, the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, P.A. entered a Notice of Appearance in the Epstein lawsuit, pending before Judge Donald Hafele (the successor to Judge Crow). As it has evolved, Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was dismissed and the lawsuit now 3 Specifically, on April 10,