Epstein Secrets

S. 980, 102 SAX 1297, 71 LEd.2d 639 (1982), cert. de- nied sub nom. Ramsey I. Donovan, 455 U.S. 940, 102 S.Ct. 1432, 71 LEd.2d 651 (1982); Wirtz'. Fowler, 372 F.2d 315 (5th Cir.1966), overruled in part, Price I. Wirtz, 412 F.2d 647 (5th Cir.1969) (en Banc) ; Donovan'. Master Printers Asso- ciation,

1969) (en bane), the court stated that it was not required to determine the scope of § 204. yet it proceeded to do just that. 372 F.2d at 332. The Fowler court found that § 204 did not prevent the disclosure of any information required un- der § 203. The court opined that in order to be meaningful, a

ssee, John T. Nixon, J., 568 F.Supp. 161, denied the law firm's sum- mary judgment motion, but granted the Secretary's. On appeal by the law firm, the Court of Appeals, Bailey Brown, Senior Circuit Judge, held that (1) the LMRDA provision exempting, from requirement that "persuaders" file reports, persons ad- vis

each, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: ann.marie.c.lillafanaralusdoi.gov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei (courtesy copy

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who arc under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

ng using the Court's CM/ECF system: Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA (courtesy copy of pleading via U.S. mail) 10 EFTA00230129 1"Afferr— Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 0

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

each, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E mail: ann.marie.c.villafana(ieusdoj.gov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei (courtesy copy

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con