Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant
e, the Government's lead argument in its response is that there was no "court proceeding" in this case that triggered Petitioner's right to confer. Gov't Response at 1-2. The Government's position flouts the plain language of the CVRA. The CVRA guarantees to Petitioner the right to confer with prosecutors "in
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant
e, the Government's lead argument in its response is that there was no "court proceeding" in this case that triggered Petitioner's right to confer. Gov't Response at 1-2. The Government's position flouts the plain language of the CVRA. The CVRA guarantees to Petitioner the right to confer with prosecutors "in
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant
e, the Government's lead argument in its response is that there was no "court proceeding" in this case that triggered Petitioner's right to confer. Gov't Response at 1-2. The Government's position flouts the plain language of the CVRA. The CVRA guarantees to Petitioner the right to confer with prosecutors "in
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ng its broad discretion." Id. at 395. In Dean, the government sought and obtained an gh pane order permitting it to negotiate a plea agreement with BP Products North America, without first consulting with the victims, individuals injured and survivors of those killed in a refinery explosion. A plea agreement was ultimat
e, the Government's lead argument in its response is that there was no "court proceeding" in this case that triggered Petitioner's right to confer. Gov't Response at 1-2. The Government's position flouts the plain language of the C'/RA. The CVRA guarantees to Petitioner the right to confer with prosecutors "in
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (71)
Entities connected to both BP Products North America and Gov't Response
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON17 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Bradley Edwards
PERSON16 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
the Southern District
LOCATION15 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
FBI
ORGANIZATION15 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
Kenneth Marra
PERSON12 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
United States
LOCATION10 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION10 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
RU
Rubin
PERSON7 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Bradley Cooper
PERSON5 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
GA
Garcia
PERSON4 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Criminal No
ORGANIZATION4 w/ BP·12 w/ Gov't
Palm Beach County
LOCATION6 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
North America
LOCATION4 w/ BP·11 w/ Gov't
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON4 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON7 w/ BP·7 w/ Gov't
WA
Walker
PERSON4 w/ BP·10 w/ Gov't