Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
selective prosecution defense, he has not met the "rigorous" standard that applies for obtaining discovery in aid of such a claim. United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 468 (1996). "[A] defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory ef
ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
selective prosecution defense, he has not met the "rigorous" standard that applies for obtaining discovery in aid of such a claim. United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 468 (1996). "[A] defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory ef
ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
selective prosecution defense, he has not met the "rigorous" standard that applies for obtaining discovery in aid of such a claim. United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 468 (1996). "[A] defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory ef
ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00022189
ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut
Page: EFTA00022189 →Page EFTA00022194
selective prosecution defense, he has not met the "rigorous" standard that applies for obtaining discovery in aid of such a claim. United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 468 (1996). "[A] defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory ef
Page: EFTA00022194 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (27)
Entities connected to both Armstrong and Minaya
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON53 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
United States
LOCATION36 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION20 w/ Armstrong·3 w/ Minaya
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Armstrong·3 w/ Minaya
Brady
PERSON9 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
CO
Collins
PERSON8 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
Giglio
PERSON7 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
CO
Coppa
PERSON7 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
FI
Finnerty
PERSON6 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
BL
Blaszczak
PERSON6 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
AV
Avellino
PERSON6 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
MI
Middendorf
PERSON5 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
AB
Abdalla
PERSON5 w/ Armstrong·3 w/ Minaya
Rivera
PERSON4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
GO
Goode
PERSON4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
UL
Ulbricht
PERSON4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
Special Housing Unit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
JU
Juliano
PERSON4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya
ME
Merlin
PERSON4 w/ Armstrong·4 w/ Minaya