Epstein Secrets

at Judge Marra 8 said in a consolidation order is you get to 9 depose Mr. Epstein one time, all right. Already 10 Mr. Epstein's been deposed by Sid Garcia in the 11 State, he's been set by in B.B., which is one of 12 your cases, by Mr. Kuvin and the State, and Mr. 13 Berger and Mr. Edwards have st

lly and 19 improperly sealed. It was done in violation of 20 all of the rules of judicial administration, and 21 we have a hearing before Judge Colbath to unseal 22 it, but Mr. Epstein faces no criminal charges 23 whatsoever. 24 MR. CRITTON: Just note my objection. I 25 think he's completely

had cases against Mr. Epstein. Or he had clients -- I don't know if he actually filed cases, but he had clients that were victims of MX. Epstein. Sid Garcia is a very prominent attorney in Palm Beach County, who was also representing victim. Spencer Nuieln was another lawyer. Ted Leopold, another prom

o that. 1 4 S 7 agreement unsealed. That's something I spent a lot of time on. I attended, I believe, at leant two hearings In front of Judge Colbath -- • To get that unsealed? A -- to get that unsealed. • What wan the purpose in getting that • unsealed? • A So that it could be used as e

is conducted in this case and how this court has historically governed discovery. 9. Interestingly, in Jane Doe 11, the state court case, attorney Sid Garcia took the deposition of the Defendant and his client, Jane Doe II, was present throughout the deposition. This is despite her claims of "emotional t

l Circuit-Palm Beach Palm Beach County Courthouse Main Judicial Complex 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Dear Judge Colbath: Tampa 40D N. Maley Dr., Ste. 1100. Tampa. FL 33002 P.O. Box 2002. Tempe. FL 33801-2602 FP 813 90 3080 fax 813-984-3070 toll five 888-395.7100 F

od morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor. Richard 14 Willits, here on behalf of the plaintiff C

ether or not I want to have it submitted to me in camera. (E.W.-13, page 42, lines 8-15(emphasis added).) All of petitioner's assertions that Judge Colbath's order under review here "violated" Judge Marra's orders, that the lower court gave only "lip service" to Judge Marra, that the supremacy clause a