Epstein Secrets

N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Esq., 501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq.,

503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard,

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 —p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had

uther & Coleman, 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Esq., 501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley 3. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq.,

Beach, Fl 33401-5913 Deanna K. Shullman 400 North Drive, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 2602 Tampa, Fl 33602 2 EFTA00184018 Spencer T. Kuvin Leopold- Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Robert D. Critton of Burma; Critton, Luttier & Coleman 515 North Flagler Drive,

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 — p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he ha

dberger & Weiss, P.A. (counsel for petitioner) Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petitioner) Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. (counsel for non-party intervener, B.B.) Honorable Kenneth A. Marra (judge, Southern District of Florida) Palm Beach News

AY AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. FILED BY S. KUVIN, ESQ [72 ODMO - ORDER DENYING MOTION Filing Da

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22— p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had