Epstein Secrets

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Ricci-Leopold, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561-684-6500 Fax: 561-515-2610 Counsel for Plaintiff in Relate

rah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Ricci-Leopold, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite

the assertion of the fifth amendment does not substitute for evidence needed to meet the burden of production"); Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2009) (recognizing that "dismissal following the assertion of the Fifth Amendment violates the Constitution where th

ce I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Fax: 561 697 2383 Counsel for Plaintiffs. day of January 2010:

es on this Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite

the assertion of the fifth amendment does not substitute for evidence needed to meet the burden of production"); Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2009) (recognizing that "dismissal following the assertion of the Fifth Amendment violates the Constitution where t

'ri Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Ricci-Leo ' .ld, P.A. ounse 08-08804 or

n of Law in Opposition to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 24 of 24 Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. ounse or ►e t 'ri Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Ricci-Leo ' .ld, P.A. ounse 08-08804 or awl in •e ate. Case No. Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterb Goldbe

the assertion of the fifth amendment does not substitute for evidence needed to meet the burden of production")• Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2009) (recognizing that "dismissal following the assertion of the Fifth Amendment violates the Constitution where th