Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716.26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716-26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and Order not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

ite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 He is expected to testify regarding the Ponzi scheme, use of the "Epstein Cases" in the furtherance thereof. 2. Ken Jenne do Broward County Sheriff's Office 2601 W. Broward Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312-1308 He is expected to testify regarding the Ponzi scheme, use

lvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4639 Depending on the testimony of witnesses and evidence presented by Edwards in his case in chief, Mr. Critton may be asked to testify as to the information about which he and his client, Jeffrey Epstein, were aware and upon which they relied in filing suit a

Production Non Party See List 12/16/2010 158 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Scott Rothstein 12/16/2010 159 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Ken Jenne 12/16/2010 160 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Gary Farmer 12/16/2010 161 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Debra Villegas 12/16/2010 162 Notd

Defendant 250 S Australian Ave Suite 1400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 Spicer. David W 11000 Prosperity Farms R Ste 104 Palm Beach Gardens FL 33410 Critton Jr. Robert D 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 EFTA00226994 Kellen, Sarah Defendant Back to Top, Additional Counsel

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01787-01788 09/04/2009 Ken Jenne Bradley J. Edwards 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lea

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01787.01788 09/04/2009 Ken Jenne Bradley J. Edwards 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lea

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e