Epstein Secrets

Mr. Marc Nurik, One East Broward Blvd., Suite 700, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; Mr. Jack Scarola, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL; Mr. Gary Farmer, 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Mr. Jack Goldberger, 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-

Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 27. All documents related to the Costs that you, as bankruptcy Trustee, are claiming related to L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's cases against Epstein. This includes any data or electronic printout of Costs which the Trustee of RRA is claiming. 28. Any employment agreements

ithin two business days following receipt of this order, Berger Singerman, as counsel for the Trustee, Herbert Stettin ("Trustee"), shall deliver to Gary Farmer at the Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. law firm ("Fanner Jaffe), a copy of the CD produced pursuant to Order 888 to Judge

re at issue here. See DE 6351, p. 23. Accordingly, the request to intervene should be denied. To the extent this Court will consider L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Access Sanctions and Costs for Other Appropriate Relief (DE 6345), this resp

56:22-25.) Q. I want to know where it came from. Did it come from documents, or did you talk to someone, a Fowler White lawyer or did you talk to Gary Farmer or did somebody else provide information to you? Where did this information come from? What were — what are the sources — every one of them — upon

affe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Counsel for Fowle

Plaintiff except for materials related to new or ongoing cases AND on the condition that they be produced "For Attorneys' Eyes Only. (Exhibit 3.) Gary Farmer, Jr. told the Special Master he would then only list on the new privilege log work product materials for existing cases and attorney-client privileg

in reliance on Edwards' previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, these e-mails must be deemed not protected by Edwards' clear waiver. See Jane Doe No. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the work-product privilege with respect to docum

of Taking Deposition Scott Rothstein 12/16/2010 159 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Ken Jenne 12/16/2010 160 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Gary Farmer 12/16/2010 161 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Debra Villegas 12/16/2010 162 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition None EFTA00227008 12/16/2010

82 Mcmp Motion to Compel And For Sanctions 05/06/2009 83 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition LM 05/06/2009 84 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Jane Doe 05/06/2009 85 Mot Motion For Protective Order 05/06/2009 86 Mot Motion For Protective Order 05/07/2009 87 Mot Motion Forprotective Order

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 14173 10/21/2009 Gary Farmer Bradley Edwards Stanely Arkin Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admis

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 14173 10/21/2009 Gary Farmer Bradley Edwards Stanely Arkin Work Productattorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admiss

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

nd not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05648 07/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Gary Farmer Assemble Epstein Litigation meeting Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discover

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr