Epstein Secrets

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

triable as of right by a jury. DATED this 10th day of $evtember, 2008. THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff STATEN FLORIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I hereby et..ity that the

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

OCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: 954-414-8033 Facsimile: 954-924-1530 Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bia s JAY HO SOCIATES, PA. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: Fa

y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req