Epstein Secrets

s Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Email: bradepathtojustice coin LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jay C. Howell Jay Howell &Associates PA 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Email: [email protected] PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled." Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Failure to enforce the government's side of a plea bargain violates Due Process. United States v. Yesil, 991 F.2d

jected to a full-scale trial, the states and the federal government would need to multiply by many times the number of judges and court facilities. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 260 (1971). "[Tjhe fact is that the guilty plea and the often concomitant plea bargain are important components of this c

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

triable as of right by a jury. DATED this 10th day of $evtember, 2008. THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff STATEN FLORIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I hereby et..ity that the

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

OCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: 954-414-8033 Facsimile: 954-924-1530 Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bia s JAY HO SOCIATES, PA. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: Fa

ot subject to being set aside, rescinded, or canceled — regardless of whether or not the government failed to comply with the CVRA. On the contrary, Santobello and its progeny require the USAO-SDFL to continue to abide by the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and due process precludes this Court from

Rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein In an effort to establish standing and circumvent the requirements of Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971), and its progeny, Petitioners argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the USAO-SDFL and Epstein is a

tterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Co-Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley James Edwards Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Lead Counsel Pm Hac Vice Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA 3 EFTA00722657 Barbara McKenna From: Sent: u ay, /;171TraftliTiTIMI:10 To: ftsd_cmecf Subject: Activity in Ca

fter a court determination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by comply