Epstein Secrets

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S

gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed

triable as of right by a jury. DATED this 10th day of $evtember, 2008. THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff STATEN FLORIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I hereby et..ity that the

t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S

gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed

OCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: 954-414-8033 Facsimile: 954-924-1530 Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

at In]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S

gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that In]othing in this chapter shall be construed

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bia s JAY HO SOCIATES, PA. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: Fa

gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed

t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S

Partner, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). The authors thank Douglas Beloof, Patricia Cassell, Meg Garvin, Jay Howell, James Marsh, and Stephen Twist for their assistance with this Article. 59 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038 --- PAGE BREAK --- 60 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104

district court decisions, which provides further support for the conclusion that the CVRA applies before charges have been filed. In United States v. Rubin,” victims of a federal securities fraud argued that they had CVRA rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific

Partner, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). The authors thank Douglas Beloof, Patricia Cassell, Meg Garvin, Jay Howell, James Marsh, and Stephen Twist for their assistance with this Article. Highlight This Article addresses whether crime victims should have rights d

isions, which provides further 79 victims of a support for the conclusion that the CVRA applies before charges have been filed. In United States v. Rubin, federal securities fraud argued that they had CVRA rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affec