Epstein Secrets

le saying he didn’t want to appear insensitive to those victimized by the storm that hammered the Caribbean and roared through South Florida, he said Coleman offered no proof, such as an affidavit from Epstein, to shore up her claims. Still,. Hafele gave Coleman extra time to respond to various motions tha

County, Florida, in her official capacity (“Court Clerk”), alleges as follows: JURISDICTION L This is an action within the exclusive,jurisdiction of the Circuit Court pursuant to Fla. Stat. Sections 26.012(2)(a) and 86.011 et seq. PARTIES 2. The Palm Beach Post is a daily community newspaper published by Plaintiff

saying he didn't want to appear insensitive to those victimized by the storm that hammered the Caribbean and roared through South Florida, he said Coleman offered no proof1 such as an affidavit from Epstein1 to shore up her claims. Still, Hafele gave Coleman extra time to respond to various motions tha

unty, Florida, in his official capacity (“Court Clerk”), alleges as follows: JURISDICTION 1. This is an action within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Circuit Court pursuant to Fla. Stat. Sections 26.012(2)(a) and 86.011 et seq. PARTIES 2. The Palm Beach Post is a daily community newspaper published by Plaintif

800 to provide for private causes of action, the Court should view this uncertainty regarding Florida state law in favor of Plaintiff. See Crowe'. Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir. 1989) (citation omitted). Furthermore, the failure of a statute to provide a private cause of action does not "pre

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [DE 11] is GRANTED. 2. This case shall be REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, case No. 50 2008 CA 006596, for lack of subject matter 7 EFTA00175533

ra 545 P.2d at 399. In any event, ARA cannot claim qualified privilege here. The only reasonable inference from the evidence in the case was that Coleman's statements were made in an effort to further the busi- ness interests of ARA by securing advan- tage over a competitor through injury to the comp

ffman'. Unit- ed St s, 8 Cir., 259 F. 35, 38, and De- moth United States, 144 F. 363, 366, 6 I.R.A., .S., 424, 7 Ann.Cas. 121; by the decision of the Circuit Court of ala of the Second Circuit in Reed ■ United States, 2 Cir., 96 F2d 785, 787, rtlorarl denied 305 U.S. 612, 59 S.Ct. 71, 83 LEd. 399; and by t