Epstein Secrets

: Smolar, Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Contents Public Corruption. 2 Epstein. 2 Collins. 18 Securities and Commodities Fraud. 20 Stewart 20 Thompson. 22 Pinto-Thomaz. 24 Narcotics. 26 Castro. 26 Rochester Drug Company. 28 Civil 3

her her clients have spoken to prosecutors. The case is U.S. v. Epstein, 19-cr-490, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special

bes By Walter Pavlo 7/30/19 Sean Stewart was indicted on insider trading charges back in May 2015 during U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's reign over the Southern District of New York. Now, over four years since his indictment, Sean can reflect back on a wild journey of being convicted, sentenced to 3 years prison, having that con

. It was classic self-dealing. The drug in question was meant to treat multiple sclerosis. It failed in clinical trials in 2017 and prosecutors say Collins illegally spread the word to family and others who were able to sell their stock before its price collapsed on the bad news. Collins has pleaded no

0, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). 16 EFTA00018481 --- PAGE BREAK --- SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Collins Editorial: Failures of ethics Buffalo News By News Editorial Board 7/29/19 The ethics specialists are right and so are the members of a special

racy." In April of this year, criminal charges were brought against Rochester Drug Co-operative. Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Ray Donovan, the Special Agent in Charge of the New York Division of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), announced the charges. Ro

ons. The Court disagrees for two independent reasons. First, under controlling Second Circuit precedent, the NPA does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Second, it does not cover the offenses charged in the S1 superseding indictment. 3 EFTA00020263 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 34 A. The non-prosecution agreement does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York United States Attorneys speak for the United States. When a U.S. Attorney makes a promise as part of a plea bargain, both contract principles and d

n the control of a civilian third party, not the Government, and so the Government need not (and perhaps cannot) produce them. See United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Finally, Maxwell's request for copies of all subpoenas the Government has issued is overly broad and lack

ons. The Court disagrees for two independent reasons. First, under controlling Second Circuit precedent, the NPA does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Second, it does not cover the offenses charged in the S1 superseding indictment. 3 EFTA00022093 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 34 A. The non-prosecution agreement does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York United States Attorneys speak for the United States. When a U.S. Attorney makes a promise as part of a plea bargain, both contract principles and d

n the control of a civilian third party, not the Government, and so the Government need not (and perhaps cannot) produce them. See United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Finally, Maxwell's request for copies of all subpoenas the Government has issued is overly broad and lack

ons. The Court disagrees for two independent reasons. First, under controlling Second Circuit precedent, the NPA does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Second, it does not cover the offenses charged in the S1 superseding indictment. 3 EFTA00029542 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 34 A. The non-prosecution agreement does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York United States Attorneys speak for the United States. When a U.S. Attorney makes a promise as part of a plea bargain, both contract principles and d

n the control of a civilian third party, not the Government, and so the Government need not (and perhaps cannot) produce them. See United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Finally, Maxwell's request for copies of all subpoenas the Government has issued is overly broad and lack

afoul of a legal ethics statute, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. Read full article » POLICY & REGULATION House Says Private Email Off-Limits In Collins Case The U.S. House of Representatives has urged a New York federal court to adopt a broader interpretation of the Constitution's speech or debate

. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Department of Justice U.S. House of Representatives U S Supreme Court United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York United States District Court for the Southern District of New York EFTA00032915 --- PAGE BREAK --- Ex-Proskauer Tax Atty Joins Brown Rudnick's