Epstein Secrets

chard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] William J. Berger [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2009

Do Not Require Independent Evidence Before An Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn Rather than analyze whether the inference satisfies the two-prong Custer Battles test, Epstein pulls another sentence out of context from the opinion, which he claims forms yet a third prong of what Custer Battles itself

has been sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees this 26th day of January 2009: Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberge

ether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions. This issue is typically resolved on a motion to compel. Custer Battles 415 F. Supp. 2d at 633. If it is determined that the privilege is properly asserted, then adverse inferences are admissible consistent with

com Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz sexabuseattomev.com Stuart S. Mermelstein ssmsexabuseattornev.com William J. Berger [email protected] 21 EFTA00234891 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/

se liberal discovery rules, and 'undermine[s] to some degree the trial system's capacity to ascertain the truth." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 632 (E.D. Va. 2006) (quoting Robert Heidt, The 8 EFTA00234878 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on