Epstein Secrets

forthwith. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 94

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1

nerated by CMIECF on this 7th day of May, 2010: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horo

the statutory provision."') ( quoting Harris v. Garner, 216 F.3d 970, 972 (11th Cir. 2000) (en bane)) (f

ents responsive to Plaintiffs’ document request no. 1 be ordered to be produced forthwith. Dated: May 28, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] ME

rimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed tax returns against a defendant without violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1976) (holding that disclosures in tax returns are not compelled incriminations and may be used as e

May 28, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)

ithout violating the Fifth Amendment”). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1