Epstein Secrets

versus Scott 12 Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and 13 Today is Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010 at 14 10:00 a.m. We're here in the law offices 15 of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & 16 Shipley, 17 West Palm Beach, Florida. 18 My name is Joe Kozak. I am the 19 videographer. The court reporter i

the main individual who advised those assembled in 7 the room that that's what was going to occur? 8 A. I don't remember. 9 Q. Was it -- did Rosenfeldt speak at all at 10 that meeting? 11 A. I, I can't remember. 1.2 Q. Do you remember the date of the meeting? 13 A. I remember that it was a

18 BY MR. CRITTON: 19 Q. Okay. I'll remember that. With regard 20 to, so as to whether or not Mr. Rothstein could have 21 accessed it or Mr. Rosenfeldt or anyone else who was 22 not an invitee at least from your knowledge, you 23 believe they cannot access it? l4 A. Correct. Q. Can you as we

ndary: Secondary: Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 9 EFTA00808712 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Teny David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brad

se and question his credibility, not because they will cause any undue prejudice because of their alleged late disclosure." Page 10 "A. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler E-mails Epstein identified and disclosed a number of emails from the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Alder firm that directly contradict sworn

t',152010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. By: Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 68 561 fax OL Flori No.: 169440 37 EFTA0072

t 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00726030 have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

SING, EDWARD FIT LEHRMAN P.L. 16 EFTA00708308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 0410811 Page 17 of 23 Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards in the matter of Epstein v. Edwards, et at Case No.: 502009C40408000CCaMBAG 1

5. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

th his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil lawsuits Mr. Edwards, an attorney with the FJW firm, is represented by Jack Scarola of the firm Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart, and Shipley.. EFTA00595514 against Epstein to recover damages for Epstein's extensive pattern of molestations. Mr refe

n the course of Edwards' representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. While an employee of the now defunct Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm and with his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil lawsuits Mr. Edwards, an attorney with the FJW firm, is represented by Jack S

ovided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 116. 74. Edwards gave notice that he intended to take David Copperfield's

Docket 01/1/2.215 Page 35 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603b§ Filed 04/u44/11 Page 34 Ot 3V have run a giant Pont scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

then, yes, the motion to stay does need to be heard. THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Scarola. MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, Jack Scarola, David Vitale from Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and Shipley; and Mr. Phil Burlington of Burlington and Rochenbach, on behalf of Mr. Edwards in this matter. As has bee

561-471-2995 EFTA00788139 29 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 named partner of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler -- a firm which Brad Edwards, at the time, was part of -- in funding the largest Ponzi scheme in history. It was also known -- Judge, if y

ber old i,2010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley By: 37 OL No.: 169440 EFTA00188902 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM ,current 291-15 Entered on FLSD L_ Ket 01/21/20

Case 9:08-cv-80C6st gsi-1346tuRrgwit 2en ofatergieocroF40 c. osa l'e)W 0,15 Page 35 of have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law finn of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative