Epstein Secrets

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge Davis. You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the

e investigators. was also turned over to the PBPD during the course of the investigation. In leitht Of The (.7omneoniised Nature Of The Evidence. A Fulsome Review Should Be Conducted. These tainted and inaccurate reports compromised the federal investigation.' As you may know. the PBPI) took the unprecedente

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

e investigators, was also turned over to the PBPD during the course of the investigation. O. In Licht Of The Compromised Nature Of The Evidence, A Fulsome Review Should Re Conducted These tainted and inaccurate reports compromised the federal investigation.' As you may know, the PBPD took the unprecedented

andle the case pro bono, with no financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given several other options to choose from, including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by . You rejected those other options. You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the case to Mr

was also turned over to the PBPD during the course of the investigation. Probable Cause D. In Linht Of The Compromised Nature Of The Evidence, A Fulsome Review Should Re Conducted. These tainted and inaccurate reports compromised the ledertil investigation' As you may know, the PBPD took the unprecedented