Epstein Secrets

Orseck Josefsberg 'S What Plaaler Street 3 4 5 6 7 8 FOR THE DEFENDANT: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (Via telephone) KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury Goldberger Weiss Assistant U.S. Attorney 500

not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this 10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue in addition to the arguments it sets forth herein. " The Post notes that A-3 through A-5 were not part of th

at the reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for E.W.; Diana L. Martin for B.B.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00233660 -Q-~

s, but there were other firms that were representing other young woman that had been abused by him. Ye➢, I did know of those firms. There vas the Podhurst firm in Miami, a very prominent firms Bob Josofsborg, who I have known for years. Bob is one of the moat prominent attorneys also in South Florida

S to strike. 14 THE MITNESS: Ho. Is BY MR. SCAROLA: IS Q If Jeffrey Epstein alleges in this 19 complaint against Bradley Edwards that III., E.W. or 24 Jane Doe voluntarily consented to their sexual 21 molestation, could Jeffrey Epstein have possibly made 22 that claim on the basis of any

ng on behalf of children who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elsa. Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas, They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

g on behalf of children who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elser, Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Pcrwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

playing 7:8 Plaza 2:18 plead 17:11 18:10,11 pleading 7:14 31:10 33:4 40:9,14 pleadings 23:4 31:3 32:13 please41:22 pled 17:8,1620:14 41:8 Podhurst 22,5 3:17 point 6:18 14:12 26:16,23 28:14 29:15 36:12 4323 pointed 14:20 portion 32:24 36:14 portions 5:15 posed 11:25 posing 8:4 position 5

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no