Epstein Secrets

Manuel Garcia, Esq. Garcia Elkins & Boehringer 224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900 West Is B F 3401 Phone: Fax: Cowts or ed Case No. 08-80469 12 Podhurst °meek,. P.A. 25 West Flog* Street, Sraite800, Miami, N. 33130, Mama- Fax • 1Poit Lauderdale wonv.podharacom EFTA00779786 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KA

zell, Esq. Robert Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst 0rseck, PA. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 May 18, 2009 Re: 11111111111111 Dear Kathy and Bob: ADELQW).BENAVEME TAItALWAL I SMISTAATUR BARBARA U. MHOS STOKFIN-BARNO WITT STOKES MAMMALS BMA R. BM:VIM OP =OHM. Additionally, Bob,

5 MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino. on behalf of 25 A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 Page 8 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 1 of a lot of residents in Palm Beach. And I got to know 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 2 Jeffrey through Lesley Wexner. And I u

ages. If you ask me how old you are. I really 4 deposition. 4 couldn't tell you. 5 MR. CRITTON: I think we cannot trust that 5 MR. CRITTON: Kathy thinks she's 25. 6 people will do them serially. I'd do them with 6 MS. EZELL: In my dreams. 7 each one. 7 THE WITNESS: Now, again. I must te

nst Mr. Epstein. The initial draft victim notification letter contained language that confirmed your Office's interpretation and indicated that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg, the selected attorney representatives. may "represent" the identified individuals. This language assumes that the selected repre

d of the recollections of the witnesses au a point in time prior to any federal involvement. Unfortunately. the police report authored by Detective Katy and certain affidavits executed by him contained both material misstatements Chicago Hong Kong I muffin LOU Atlaulr,r Munich Son Francisco Was

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

n earlier proposal that had been discussed amongst the parties to rely on a Special Master to resolve outstanding fee-related issues. We agree with Kathy's "proposal" that we rely on a Special Master to resolve all outstanding fee issues. Let's work during our Wednesday meeting to select an appropria

law. A letter to Judge (authored by then FAUSA Sloman) dated October 25, 2007 followed. See Exhibit 17, October 25, 2007 Letter to Judge Once Mr. Podhurst's firm was selected by Judge M, Mr. Epstein did not object to the selection. Moreover, as you have acknowledged to the court, the open issues involv

n earlier proposal that had been discussed amongst the parties to rely on a Special Master to resolve outstanding fee-related issues. We agree with Kathy's "proposal" that we rely on a Special Master to resolve all outstanding fee issues. Let's work during our Wednesday meeting to select an appropria

loyment agency -- A. No. Q. -- or an ad in the paper? A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Griffon, on behalf of 4 Jeffrey Epstein. 5 THEREUPON, 6 JUAN ALESSI, 7 h

. But, you know I am not -- I don't think 1 am a very good judge of ages. If you ask me how old you arc. I really couldn't tell you. MR. CRITTON: Kathy thinks she's 25. MS. EZELL: In my dreams. TIIE WITNESS: Now, again. I must tell you, I was never told to check any i.d.s on any of the people who

akes no position as to the validity of any such claim units statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

n earlier proposal that had been discussed amongst the parties to rely on a Special Master to resolve outstanding fee-related Issues. We agree with Kathy's "proposal" that we rely on a Special Master to resolve all outstanding fee issues. Lets work during our Wednesday meeting to select an appropriat

no position as to the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states that Mr. Podhurst and Mr. Josefsberg may "represent" the identified individuals. Since we have not yet had the opportunity to speak with Mr. Podhurst or Mr. Josefsbe

n earlier proposal that had been discussed amongst the parties to rely on a Special Master to resolve outstanding fee-related Issues. We agree with Kathy's "proposal" that we rely on a Special Master to resolve all outstanding fee issues. Lets work during our Wednesday meeting to select an appropriat