Epstein Secrets

take positions during the investigation and negotiation of this matter that has led to unprecedented federal overreaching. In fact. Judge I lerben Stern's states " . . Alta federal authorities inappropriately involved themselves in the investigation by the state authorities and employed highly irregu

as indicted by a Florida Grand Jury on one count of felony solicitation of prostitution. 3. In a publicly released letter, Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter criticized the Grand Jury's decision and the State Attorney's handling of the case. Shortly after the Grand Jury's indictment, the Chief took the u

released letter, Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter criticized the Grand Jury's decision and the Sta

he federal statutes would be applicable to Mr. Epstein's conduct, a lay person cannot be expected to make that determination. As confirmed by Judge Stern's conclusions regarding the application of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the

with a third party, to the procurer's financial advantage. This distinction is a matter within the exclusive prerogative of the legislative branch. Register, 715 So.2d 274, 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). (emphasis added) 2 Similarly, in Kobel v. State, the defendant's conviction under § 796.03 was reversed bec

of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at imam is clearly not within the predictable scope of jt 2422. See Judge Stern's Letter ("In sum. whatever sexual contact occurred. occurred face to lace. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persuad

with a third party, to the procurer's fimmeial advantage. 'Ibis distinction is a matter within the exclusive prerogative of the legislative branch. Register. 715 So.2d 274.278 (Ha. 1st DCA 1998). (emphasis added)- Similarly, in Kobel v. Mile. the defendant's conviction under * 796.03 was reversed because

n of F 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the predictable scope of 2422. See Judge Stern's 1.etter ("In stun. whatever sexual contact occurred, occurred face to face. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persu

procure the minor to engage in a sex act with a third party, not tlx: defendant himself. 'Ibis clear demarcation is well settled law in Florida. In Register v. Susie. for instance. the cowl reversed a conviction of 796.03 ftw a defendant who offered a 12-year-old girl money to have sex with hint. Tlx: c