5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
here was no basis to intervene in the matter. We will not be making additional comments. Thanks for checking with us. Thanks so much for your help, John Connolly From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:05 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: John Connolly Vanity Fair
ink] to John Conolly of Vanity Fair. Let's discuss ASAP so I can send him a response. After we agree on a proposed response, I need to run this by DOJ-Public Affairs before sending out. Thanks From: john1885c [mailto: Sent: Frid larch 18, 2011 1:51 PM To: ,M (USAFLS) Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair
here was no basis to intervene in the matter. We will not be making additional comments. Thanks for checking with us. Thanks so much for your help, John Connolly From: (USAFLS) < Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 4:33 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: Subject: (USAFLS) RE: John Connolly
ink] to John Conolly of Vanity Fair. Let's discuss ASAP so I can send him a response. After we agree on a proposed response, I need to run this by DOJ-Public Affairs before sending out. Thanks From: john1885c [mailto: Sent: Fridl larch 18, 2011 1:51 PM To: ,M (USAFLS) Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fai
here was no basis to intervene in the matter. We will not be making additional comments. Thanks for checking with us. Thanks so much for your help, John Connolly From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:17 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: John Connolly Vanity Fa
ink] to John Conolly of Vanity Fair. Let's discuss ASAP so I can send him a response. After we agree on a proposed response, I need to run this by DOJ-Public Affairs before sending out. Thanks From: john1885c [mailto: Sent: Frid larch 18, 2011 1:51 PM To: ,M (USAFLS) Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair
here was no basis to intervene in the matter. We will not be making additional comments. Thanks for checking with us. Thanks so much for your help, John Connolly From: (USAFLS) < Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:31 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: John Connolly Vanity F
ink] to John Conolly of Vanity Fair. Let's discuss ASAP so I can send him a response. After we agree on a proposed response, I need to run this by DOJ-Public Affairs before sending out. Thanks From: john1885c [mailto: Sent: Frid larch 18, 2011 1:51 PM To: ,M (USAFLS) Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair
here was no basis to intervene in the matter. We will not be making additional comments. Thanks for checking with us. Thanks so much for your help, John Connolly EFTA00206502
ink] to John Conolly of Vanity Fair. Let's discuss ASAP so I can send him a response. After we agree on a proposed response, I need to run this by DOJ-Public Affairs before sending out. Thanks From: john1885c [mailto: Sent: Fridl larch 18, 2011 1:51 PM To: ,M (USAFLS) Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fai
Entities connected to both John Connolly and DOJ-Public Affairs

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bear Stearns
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONJohn Connolly Vanity Fair
PERSONKirkland & Ellis
ORGANIZATIONSinger Island
LOCATIONthe West Palm Beach State
ORGANIZATIONthe State Court
ORGANIZATIONConflict/Recusal Issue
ORGANIZATION