Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
her or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury, generally rests entirely in his discretion") (footnote omitted), and Nixon I United States , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)(Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case).
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
her or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury, generally rests entirely in his discretion") (footnote omitted), and Nixon v. United States , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)(Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case).
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
her or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury, generally rests entirely in his discretion") (footnote omitted), and Nixon I United States , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)(Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case).
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rely in his discretion") (footnote omitted), and Nixon I. United States , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)(Execu
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (33)
Entities connected to both Cynthia Nixon and D.E. 38)(emphasis
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON222 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
United States
LOCATION141 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON87 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON56 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON49 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON48 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
the Southern District
LOCATION44 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Paul Cassell
PERSON25 w/ Cynthia·3 w/ D.E.
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION23 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Hayes
PERSON16 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ D.E.
McLymont
LOCATION12 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Ashcroft
PERSON10 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
BO
Bordenkircher
PERSON10 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Cynthia·2 w/ D.E.
the Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
TW
Twombly
PERSON6 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
CD
Cash Inn of Dade
PERSON6 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
Metropolitan Dade County
LOCATION5 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.
OW
Owens
PERSON5 w/ Cynthia·4 w/ D.E.