Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ey- client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.14 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe
discretion is concerned because "the decision to prosecute is particularly ill-suited to judicial review." Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607; see also 35 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 203, 203 n.648 (2006). "Such factors as the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterrence value, the Government's enf
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ney-client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.14 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe
discretion is concerned because "the decision to prosecute is particularly ill-suited to judicial review." Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607; see also 35 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 203, 203 n.648 (2006). "Such factors as the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterrence value, the Government's en
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ney-client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.14 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe
discretion is concerned because "the decision to prosecute is particularly ill-suited to judicial review." Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607; see also 35 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 203, 203 n.648 (2006). "Such factors as the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterrence value, the Government's en
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ney-client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.I4 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe
discretion is concerned because "the decision to prosecute is particularly ill-suited to judicial review." Wayte, 470 U.S. at 607; see also 35 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 203, 203 n.648 (2006). "Such factors as the strength of the case, the prosecution's general deterrence value, the Government's en
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (68)
Entities connected to both Myers and L.J. Ann
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON126 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
George W. Bush
PERSON100 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
United States
LOCATION72 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
Michael Jackson
PERSON61 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION51 w/ Myers·2 w/ L.J.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION47 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON46 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
Donald Trump
PERSON46 w/ Myers·2 w/ L.J.
LB
Leon Black
PERSON44 w/ Myers·2 w/ L.J.
the Southern District
LOCATION27 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
Michael Douglas
PERSON26 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
WR
Wright
PERSON21 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON20 w/ Myers·4 w/ L.J.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Myers·4 w/ L.J.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON11 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
the Federal Rules of Civil
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.
West Palm Beach
LOCATION11 w/ Myers·2 w/ L.J.
Paul Cassell
PERSON11 w/ Myers·2 w/ L.J.
United States Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Myers·4 w/ L.J.
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Myers·5 w/ L.J.