4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
of $506,847.78 for 5 years of sexual harassment and sexual touching was reasonable). Unfortunately, the parties were unable to reach a agreement. Myers clearly demonstrates that Epstein's offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe
offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe as compared to the allegations in Myers. Moreover, allowing such discovery at this juncture goes against the grain and the law in that Plaintiff has not made a reasonable showing establish
33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F isidrogarcia©bellsouth.net Counsel .for:Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 ' Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] kezell@p
kes it clear that there is a compelling need for any net worth discovery not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege. 5 Defendant relies upon Myers v. Central Florida Investment, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (11th Cir. 2010) for its “stipulation” argument. In Myers, however, the district court heard tes
Myers, however, the district court heard testimony regarding each of the defendant’s net worth. There was no unilateral statement of net worth in Myers as Defendant wishes to create in the instant case. To the extent that Defendant relies upon the Court’s holding in Myers regarding the reasonablen
Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits lawyerwilli
ures. Such a stipulation more than satisfies any necessity for the disclosure of the tax returns or any additional net worth information. See e.g., Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (I Ith Cir. 2010)(reasoning that a compensatory award of $103,622.09 and a punitive damage award
of $506,847.78 for 5 years of sexual harassment and sexual touching was reasonable). Unfortunately, the parties were unable to reach a agreement. Myers clearly demonstrates that Epstein's offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe
3401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counselfor·Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- , 80469 • Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] kezell@p
Amendment privilege. 5 Defendant relies upon Myers v. Central Florida Investment, Inc., 592 F.3d 120
here was no unilateral statement of net worth in Myers as Defendant wishes to create in the instant case
.net Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike MPi
Entities connected to both Myers and Katherine W. Ezell

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSONRichard Horace Willits
PERSONJack Patrick Hill
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSONIsidro Manuel Garcia
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONJack Scarola
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Lake Worth
LOCATIONScott Rothstein
PERSON