Epstein Secrets

ey- client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.14 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe

litigation. 4 The Government asserts that the work•product doctrine applies to documents prepared by ('191 attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case (DE 276-1 at 12-14). Alt

maintenance of independence as between the legislative, the executive and the judicial branches" was essential to the preservation of liberty, P a Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 116, 47 S. Ct. 21, 25, 71 L.Ed. 160 ( I 926)—federal courts must stay out of the prosecution business. But despite

his or her oath. 10 The DOD's failure to discipline its own prosecutors heightens the importance of the CVRA's private right of action. The DOD's Office of Professional Responsibility ('OPR") conducted a review of the Epstein case. While the Report found that prosecutors exercised "poor judgment; it concluded they did not commit

ney-client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar misconduct"); United States v. Myers, 593 F.3d 338, 347 n.14 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting that exception applied where litigant "defrauded" public defender by submitting false invoices). Pe

ocuments subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #3 P-013227 April 23, 2008 Memo from to Privacy Act Office of Professional Responsibility re Self Reporting, Corrected Version of the previously submitted April 21, 2008 Lett Box #3 P-013226 Thm P-013230 April 21, 2008 Letter from