Epstein Secrets

at he had until June 30 to enter a guilty plea and Villafafia email to Lefkowirz re same B-49 6/23/2008 Villafaiia, Kuyrkendall, Richards, cc: Atkinson Senior Email regarding New York Jane Doe and awaiting a response from DAG's office 6/23/2008 Emails between A. Marie Villafafia, E. Nesbitt Kuyr

tion Agreement incorporating Acosta edits provided to Gerald Lefeourt on 9/11/2007 68 6/18/2008- 6/19/2008 Entails between Villafafia, Krischer, Atkinson, Senior, Acosta, Sloman. and Garcia regarding Epstein's case with state court and how it might breach the NPA 69 12/14/2007 Draft letter to Kriseh

person. and assisted in finding counseling and other services for them. Justice Denar ment Personnel CEOS Deputy Chief Gelber (still at DOJ): Ms. Gelber was part of the team that reviewed the case and the NPA when Epstein "appealed" to DOJ. Ms. Gelber also is familiar with my work from a prior case

victims, met with them in person. and assisted in finding counseling and other services for them. Justice Denar ment Personnel CEOS Deputy Chief Gelber (still at DOJ): Ms. Gelber was part of the team that reviewed the case and the NPA when Epstein "appealed" to DOJ. Ms. Gelber also is familiar with

llafana to Lourie, Garcia, and Atkinson, September 18, 2007, 11:43 a.m., RE: Dratt Agreemcnts?, with e-mails from Villafana to Lourie, Garcia and Atkinson (September 18, 2007, 11:18 a.m.), Leficowitz to Villafana (September 18, 2007, 11:09 a.m.), and Villafana to Lefkowitz (September 18, 2007, 9:14 a

P-013875 Inadvertently marked as privileged, will be produced Suppl. Box 3 P-013876 Thru P-013877 E-mail, Villafana to Louric, Garcia, and Atkinson, September 19, 2007, 4:33 p.m., RE: Draft Plea Agreement, with e-mail from Lefkowitz to Villafana (September 19, 2007, 3:44 p.m.), and Lefkowit

on Deliberative Process Work Product Attorney-Client Privilege 30 3/19/2008-3/21/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, Drew Oosterbaan (CEOS), Gelber (CEOS), Jeff Sloman, and Robert Senior about meeting between Esptein counsel and CEOS and follow-up questions Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Pr

neys insisted that Criminal Chief Senior and that CEOS conduct similarly sterile reviews free from the "taint" of me and the federal agents. If Ms. Atkinson and I or the agents and I reached out to the SAO to discuss how the NPA should be worded to insure that we were getting correct information from Eps

y. Now, victims from many child pornography "series" have been identified and have attorney contact information for purposes of restitution. CEOS' Gelber is the national expert in this area. To summarize, my understanding of my obligation was: to do my best to notify victims of upcoming court proceed