Epstein Secrets

Epstein from fulfilling the material terms and conditions the Agreement. As you know, this is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina I Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Your reference to requiring "Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt, though he believes he did not comm

36-CV-MARRA P-013349 EFTA00230254 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 7 OF 7 The letter's assertions regarding representation by the Podhurst firm and Mr. Josefsberg are accurate and will not be changed. Judge Davis conferred with Messrs. Podhurst and Josefsberg to insure their willingnes

udge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et at 10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his guilty plea and sentence. A

that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL

former United States District Court Judge Edward B. Davis would serve as the independent third-party. Judge Davis selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims. EFTA00214458 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, EsQ. May 19, 2008 PAGE 5 OF 6 C.

that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct: 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL re

agreed that former ' States District Court Judge Edward B. would serve as the independent third-party. Judge selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims. EFTA00224783 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. May 19, 2008 PAGE 5 OF 6 C.

that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL re

reed that former United States District Court Judge Edward B. would serve as the independent third-party. Judge selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims. EFTA00194235 JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. , 2008 PAGE 4 OF 5 state cou

that the SDFL.has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL r

former United States District Court Judge Edward B: Davis would serve as the independent third-party. Judge Davis selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012201 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. May 19, 2008 PAGE 5 OF 6

ges. 7 THE WITNESS: Upon the instruction of my 8 lawyer, I must invoke my Fifth Amendment right 9 BY MR. KUVIN: 10 Q. Do your parents live in North Carolina? 11 MR. RHEINHART: Instruct the witness not 12 to answer the question based on her Fifth 13 Amendment privilege. 14 THE WITNESS: On instructi

loyment agency -- A. No. Q. -- or an ad in the paper? A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Griffon, on behalf of 4 Jeffrey Epstein. 5 THEREUPON, 6 JUAN ALESSI, 7 h