Epstein Secrets

ese show cause proceedings were instituted shortly thereafter. A privilege determination has never been made and that issue is currently before the State Court. The only issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey E

ng line of questions about his firm's review of the disc after its discovery: Q. How did she [Paralegal Tina Campbell] review the disc contents? Rockenbach (counsel for Mr. Link): I am going to object on the basis of, not only work product protection, but that this exceeds the scope of Judge Ray's orde

osenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the E

ou've done your job." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 59:1-4.)5 • "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit in the manner in which they had to do it and the

ecum of J. Epstein and Motion for Protective Order 06/20/18 RJG Review Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces 0.90 355.50 Tecum of J. Epstein (State Court) and hearing transcript on B. Edwards' Motion to Permit Limited Deposition of J. Epstein in preparation for drafting Objections to Notice 06/20/1

e Amount Currency Effecti Date ve Confirmation Number Approval Status Jeffrey Epstein - NOW -'9691 JEE to Link and Rockonbach PA Link and Rockenbach, PA. 122,434.53 USD 07/18/2918 2541126401 1 of 1 received EFTA00799164 From: Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: Link a Rockenbach Revised June Bill