Epstein Secrets

rida, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RBR, The following are statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel. • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the

cial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 o fax] By: Is/ Scott J. Link Kara Berard Rockenbach Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST 5

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

requests to be excused from personally attending the Show Cause hearing. Epstein will be represented at the hearing by his counsel, Chad Pugatch and Scott J. Link. ARGUMENT A. What Happened to the Disc in 2018 is Not a Violation of This Court's November 2010 Agreed Order. The Court was clear that issues re

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that would benefit the Court in deciding if Epstein violated

equests to be excused from personally attending the show cause hearing. Epstein will be represented at the hearing by his counsel, Chad Pugatch and Scott J. Link. ARGUMENT A. What Happened to the Disc in 2018 is Not a Violation of This Court's November 2010 Agreed Order. The Court was clear that issues re

ese show cause proceedings were instituted shortly thereafter. A privilege determination has never been made and that issue is currently before the State Court. The only issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey E

t the upcoming October 26, 2018, evidentiary hearing, and to strike irrelevant, scandalous and impertinent questions asked during the deposition of Scott J. Link, acting as corporate representative of the law firm Link & Rockenbach, PA ("Link & Rockenbach"), which occurred on October 13, 2018. Due to the imp

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

requests to be excused from personally attending the Show Cause hearing. Epstein will be represented at the hearing by his counsel, Chad Pugatch and Scott J. Link. ARGUMENT A. What Happened to the Disc in 2018 is Not a Violation of This Court's November 2010 Agreed Order. The Court was clear that issues re

osenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the E

ember 9, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN Primary Primary Second Second Counsel for Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 20 EFTA00794296 SERVICE LIST