Epstein Secrets

SUBJECT:S i FROM: • x) NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: COMMENTS: Original document: To follow via regular mail . To follow via Federal Express tz _vio follow via hand delivery Nothing to follow, FAX := original EFTA00184010 07/20/2000 15:22 FAX USA° WP 07 -2a -'09 14:21 ,WIRRS & LOCIC

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

at the United States Attorney's Office make diligent efforts to provide notice to all known victims in the above-captioned case, by certified mail, Federal Express, or hand delivery. In such notice, the United States shall provide notice of the ability of such victims or their guardians to seek restitution, as

of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(c)(9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

at the United States Attorney's Office make diligent efforts to provide notice to all known victims in the above-captioned case, by certified mail, Federal Express, or hand delivery. In such notice, the United States shall provide notice of the ability of such victims or their guardians to seek restitution, as

ure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

711 (561) 820-8777 (Fax) cfr NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: COMMENTS: Original document: • To follow via regular mail To follow via Federal Express To follow via hand delivery Nothing to follow, FAX = original EFTA00233657 07/20/2009 15:22 FAX 5618059848 USAO WEB CONFRM 07-20-'09 14:

ith be argued that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection o