Epstein Secrets

ocuments subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #1 P-003553 Thru P-0035558 Printout of filenames from Federal Express subpoena response with Attorney notations Work product 6(e) Box #1 P-003556 Thru P-003562 Document entitled "Identified Numbers" with accomp

not parties to this litigation File folder entitled from Fed Ex Records" cor.stisin handwritten and typed attorney ( notes and screen shots of FedEx subpoena response electronic file Box #1 P-001057 thru P-001959 File folder entitled "Colonial Bank Records" containing records received in re

ed secrecy; and (3) the request is structured to cover only needed materials. United States v. Moussaoui, 483 F.3d 220, 235 (4th Cir. 2007) (citing Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 222 (1979)). 20. Portions of Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 are relevant to a judicial proceeding, that is, the Ja

to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331655 EFTA_00204381 EFTA02729367 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by E-Mail and Federal Express this 3o.t.day of June, 2009, to: JEFFREY H. SLOMAN U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beac

6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

losed. Once these documents are disclosed, irreparable harm will result. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by E-Mail and Federal Express this 3ccr.4- day of June, 2009, to: JEFFREY H. SLOMAN U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm B

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

BOULEVARD• SUITE I200. FORT LAUDERDALE. FL 33301-2211• PH. 954.356.0011 • FAX 954.356.0022 Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Email: February 26, 2015 Via Federal Express Federal Bureau of Investigation Attn: FOI/PA Request Reeord/Information Dissemination Section Federal Bureau of Investigation Department of Justi

he invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to co. quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nonhwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667. 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffic

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this day of June, 2009, to: JUDITH STEVENSON ARCO U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District State Attorney's Office-West Palm Beach 500 South Au

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this 30,1a... day of June, 2009, to: U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. B

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this 3oM.. day of June, 2009, to: U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLI

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

0• FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2211• PH. 954.356.0011 • FAX 954.356.0022 Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Email: [email protected] February 26, 2015 Via Federal Express Federal Bureau of Investigation Attn: FM/PA Request Record/Information Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4843 Federal

pt the invitation and made no submission. The court then entered an order granting the motions to quash. Applying the balancing test set forth in Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 99 S.Ct. 1667, 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979), the court found that the government had failed to establish a suffi