Epstein Secrets

Y B uRLINcTorg OFVICE IN THE GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORN DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33(33 F: Email: www.coffeyburlingtoo.com EFTA00223348 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNDER SEAL -CIV.MARRA EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Plaintiffs. vs. JAN JONES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ailda

llants, I JAN JONES INTERNATIONAL, INC. a/k/a ICON BY JAN JONES, Defendant-Appellee. In re EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Under Seal- Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS Petitione

vestment or Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTHSTEIN and as yet other unknown co-conspirators and as a result of the litigation tactics undertaken by the Litigation Team and ■. as set forth herein, Plaintiff EPSTEIN has Incurred and continues to incur the monetary damages including, but not limited to, having to pay an am

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant

estment or Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTHSTEIN and as yet other unknown co-conspirators arid as a result of the litigation tactics undertaken by the Litigation Team and ■. as set forth herein, Plaintiff EPSTEIN has incurred and continues to incur the monetary damages including, but not limited to, having to pay an a

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893-1CAM, or in the alternative for a Protective Order pursuant

vestment or Ponzi scheme orchestrated by ROTHSTEIN and as yet other unknown co-conspirators and as a result of the litigation tactics undertaken by the Litigation Team and ■. as set forth herein, Plaintiff EPSTEIN has incurred and continues to incur the monetary damages including, but not limited to, having to pay an a