Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
17. The Government argues there are two relevant facts which will permit the Court to resolve the legal issue: (1) there are no criminal charges in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Florida State Court on June 30, 2008, was
how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
17. The Government argues there are two relevant facts which will permit the Court to resolve the legal issue: (1) there are no criminal charges in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Florida State Court on June 30, 2008, was
how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
17. The Government argues there are two relevant facts which will permit the Court to resolve the legal issue: (1) there are no criminal charges in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Florida State Court on June 30, 2008, was
how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
17. The Government argues there are two relevant facts which will permit the Court to resolve the legal issue: (1) there are no criminal charges in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Florida State Court on June 30, 2008, was
how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to deny the() [Jane Doe Petitioners) their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFIA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00189807 AUSA
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (30)
Entities connected to both the United States District Court and Jane Doe Petitioners
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON526 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
the Southern District
LOCATION444 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
United States
LOCATION341 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
FBI
ORGANIZATION243 w/ the·2 w/ Jane
Kenneth Marra
PERSON208 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION205 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON193 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Bradley Edwards
PERSON156 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
George W. Bush
PERSON155 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON142 w/ the·3 w/ Jane
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON130 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON118 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Office for the Southern District of Florida
ORGANIZATION33 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Lilly Ann Sanchez
PERSON20 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Dexter Lee
PERSON18 w/ the·2 w/ Jane
Judicial Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION15 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
S.
S.R.
PERSON11 w/ the·3 w/ Jane
T.
T.M.
PERSON10 w/ the·3 w/ Jane
William Kennedy Smith
PERSON9 w/ the·4 w/ Jane
Florida State Court
ORGANIZATION9 w/ the·4 w/ Jane