Epstein Secrets

ITATION. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. WHY SHOULD I READ THIS NOTICE? This Notice is given pursuant to an order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"). This Notice serves to inform you of the proposed settlement of the above- captioned class actio

ULD I READ THIS NOTICE? This Notice is given pursuant to an order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"). This Notice serves to inform you of the proposed settlement of the above- captioned class action lawsuit for $290 million in cash (the "Settlement

t for the District of the Virgin Islands (St. Thomas Division), that was transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (R

transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (the "Action"), and, by order of th

t for the District of the Virgin Islands (St. Thomas Division), that was transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (R

transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (the "Action"), and, by order of th

the Class as set forth in ¶ 1.4 above. 1.6 "Class Period" means the period from January 1, 1998, to August 10, 2019, inclusive. 1.7 "Court" means the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. 1.8 "Defendant" means JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 1.9 "Defendant's Counsel" means Wilmer Cutler Pickering H

ITIGATION The Litigation is currently pending before Judge Jed S. Rakoff in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"). The initial complaint in this action was filed on November 24, 2022, and JPMC moved to dismiss the initial complaint on December All capitalized

gard to the principles of New York law regarding conflicts of laws. 21. Each Party irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York over any proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Each Party agrees that service of any proce

d Defendants in a lawsuit now pending before the Honorable John G. Roth! of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), captioned v. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwel under Case No. 1:17-C1f-00616 (the "Lawsuit") in which Plaintiff alleges conduct by Defendants

t for the District of the Virgin Islands (St. Thomas Division), that was transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (R

transferred, by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"), entitled Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., No. 10 Civ. 1226 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (the "Action"), and, by order of th

rt file O Destroyed 0 Returned to the party or counsel for the party, as identified above A`tancy for: United Stales of Vifierica EFTA00179092 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-64 AND OLY-64 FGJ 07-103 (WPB) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLE

's command for the production of computers, as if all it wanted was possession of the physical items themselves. For example, the government wishes the "Court to proceed on the manifestly erroneous assumption that the subpoenas are "narrowly tailored" to seek only the "physical computers removed from Epst