Epstein Secrets

ors." 28 U.S.C. § 1863(a). This District's current plan was adopted in 2009. See Amended Plan for the Random Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors in the United States District Court for the 2 EFTA00106021 Southern District of New York ("Jury Plan"), available at https://nysd.uscourts.govisites/defaultffiles/pdffiuryplan feb

STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 A. Procedural History 2 B. This District's Jury Plan 2 ARGUMENT 4 EFTA00106018 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 5, 7 Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474 (1990) 1 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 4 United States v

stematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons from the jury selection process, in violation of Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right. In Duren v. Missouri, the Supreme Court set forth the three elements that must be shown to establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requir

ors." 28 U.S.C. § 1863(a). This District's current plan was adopted in 2009. See Amended Plan for the Random Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors in the United States District Court for the 2 EFTA00077253 Southern District of New York ("Jury Plan"), available at https://nysd.uscourts.govisites/defaultffiles/pdffiuryplan feb

STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 A. Procedural History 2 B. This District's Jury Plan 2 ARGUMENT 4 EFTA00077250 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 5, 7 Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474 (1990) 1 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 4 United States v

stematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons from the jury selection process, in violation of Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right. In Duren v. Missouri, the Supreme Court set forth the three elements that must be shown to establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requir

ors." 28 U.S.C. § 1863(a). This District's current plan was adopted in 2009. See Amended Plan for the Random Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors in the United States District Court for the 2 EFTA00099514 Southern District of New York ("Jury Plan"), available at https://nysd.uscourts.govisites/defaultffiles/pdffiuryplan feb

STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 A. Procedural History 2 B. This District's Jury Plan 2 ARGUMENT 4 EFTA00099511 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 5, 7 Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474 (1990) 1 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) 4 United States v

stematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons from the jury selection process, in violation of Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right. In Duren v. Missouri, the Supreme Court set forth the three elements that must be shown to establish a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requir

ion of Law and Morals, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 (1958) 130 Sexual Abuse Prosecutions, 77 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1 (1986) 24 xxvi EFTA00103025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The G

(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni