Epstein Secrets

28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and 1 hereby remove this action' from Palm Beach County Circuit Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and respectfully state as follows: 1. This case is within the original jurisdiction of this Court. This cas

ll PSI DIP PTV DIE Comm of Tim Slug I 1 I lotorporsted o• ?not pal Plip<c 1 • 14 of bums. le IM. Stir. Cheap( Abotbat Stew 1 Cowes or Salem if. 1 Portia. Covatev I 1 1 2 lacamorated Pl.ce of UsingII In Atwobir Snit I Foreign Nunn 1 1 S •ruRE OF SUIT (Plu...'X - ie Dnee.i D.I

mmarize any CDM or portions thereof, absent leave of the Court to file the document or portion thereof under seal in accordance with Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. See Exhibit 1, Proposed Protective Confidentiality Order. EFTA00191290 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247

ikissIrg LEGAREAEGIS AV ALM Ay•2014TOPRAITOLAWYERS saws- MASS TORTS outkoliont Aswan Curaw4 Cement • State IS wok Ike 021, Marianne Carlisle Salem Way to so, Cobs. pig' 19 lows tigo • Ua Fanner Jaffe Weissktg shared a Ink • 2 roan sip FJ wig a Lawsult for SOX/sally Assault by a massage The

ssentials of prison life. D. Litigation challenging conditions of detention at ADX Florence 110. In Sattar v. Gonzales 2009 WL 606115 (D.Colo.2009) the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissed a challenge to conditions of detention at ADX Florence and to the imposition of special administrative measu

ting State (see Olaechea Cahuas v. Spain, no. 24668/03, §§ 43 and 44, 10 August 2006; Youb Saoudi v. Spain (dec.), no. 22871/06, 18 September 2006; Salem v. Portugal (dec.), no. 26844/04, 9 May 2006; and Nivette v. France (dec.), no. 44190/98, ECHR 2001-VII). In those cases, the Court did not seek to