5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
A00224642 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG who advised him to make the following proposal: "[w]e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding whethe
ward and, more importantly, the victims. I have attached the proposed draft indictment for you to consider the nature and gravity of the crimes. See Tab G. You are invited to evaluat w er I, along with U.S. Attorney A minal DivisiSiefs and, later Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs followed by and AUSA
no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "bode will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi
ng forward and, more importantly, the victims. I have attached the proposed indictment for you to consider the nature and gravity of the crimes. See Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal
A00225184 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "[wie will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard
ward and, more importantly, the victims. I have attached the proposed draft indictment for you to consider the nature and gravity of the crimes. See Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal
no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DRAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi
ng forward and, more importantly, the victims. I have attached the proposed indictment for you to consider the nature and gravity of the crimes. See Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal
the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "[wje will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w
ward and, more importantly, the victims. I have attached the proposed draft indictment for you to consider the nature and gravity of the crimes. See Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether i, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal
Entities connected to both USA Acosta and Tab G.

Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONSanchez
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alice Fisher
PERSON
Podhurst
PERSONAnn Sanchez
PERSON
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONHerman
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Joe D. Whitley
PERSON
Mark Filip
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON