Epstein Secrets

Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia; and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the District of Maryland, where he served as the Chief of the Appellate Division. After leaving federal service, Mr. Biran served as the named partner in his own firm, Biran Kelly, before joining Baker Donelson as a partner. 5

of the firm Baker Donelson to allow him to fulfill his obligations in representing the undersigned in connection with an investigation conducted by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility; (2) the entry of a Protective Order; and (3) the sealing of this Application, and the accompanying Orders

ttorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was ha live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school roommate.

prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised his rights to appeal to the Department of Justice with the full consent and knowledge of the USAO, he has not breached the Agreement. The re-commencing of the Grand Jury is in violation of the Agree

acsimile: www.kirkland.com Dir. Fax: June 19, 2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we be

e prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised his rights to appeal to the Department of Justice with the full consent and knowledge of the USAO, he has not breached the Agreement. The re-commencing of the Grand Jury is in violation of the Agreem

rney representative.” She - had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a “good friend in the Appellate Division.” Ms. Villafana’s account was misleading, as it omitted that this “good friend” was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-s

r federal prosecutor Francey Hakes, who worked in the Justice Department’s crimes against children unit. On Sept. 24, 2007,

about putting something in writing if there’s nothing improper or unethical in the case,” said former federal prosecutor Francey Hakes, who worked in the Justice Department’s crimes against children unit. On Sept. 24, 2007, another agreement was reached, but Epstein still wasn’t happy with it, emails show. Lefkowitz cont

le documents under seal. This is not particular to People v. Epstein; it is routine across our appellate filings. My understanding is that it is also the Appellate Division’s (the court's) practice to maintain such seal. That being said, | have discussed your second question with our attorneys. If the Post petitions the c