Epstein Secrets

cheme. EFTA00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

ase 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT Z (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. T1) Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refe

cheme. EFTA00729418 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information arc realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

cheme. EFTA00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

• Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSO Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLED Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COOT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, l8 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

S was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bi

ase 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. 113 Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refe