Epstein Secrets

cheme. EFTA00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

525 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 2 of 36 COUNT 1, (Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1962(d)) 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. (h

cheme. EFTA00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

5624 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 2 of 36 COUNT I (Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §I 962(d)) 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. (h

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

3851 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 2 of 36 COUNT 1 (Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1962(d)) 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. (h

S was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory and sound-bi

3304 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12101/2009 Page 2 of 36 COUNT 1 (Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1962(d)) 1. The General Allegations of this Information are realleged and expresslyincorporated herein as if set forth in full. THE ENTERPRISE 2. The law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, Y.A. (he