Epstein Secrets

9 1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001 $ 9:27 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 4 This is the videotaped deposition of 4 1561) 471-2995 5 Berger in the matter of Jeffrey 5 APPEARANCES: 6 For Plaintiff: 4 Epstein versus Scott Rothstein and Bradley 7 LINK 4 ROCKENBACH, . Edwards. 1555

n't have any further 15 A Yes. 25 questions. 16 Q Right. And I bet it was a shock to you 16 REDIRECT EXAMINATION 13 that ho was running a Ponzl scram, because nowhere 17 BY KR. SCAROLA: IS in your mind would you have thought that was 10 0 Ara there any other sections of this 19 possib

rts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. n 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 73 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 75 25 Singerman on behalf of the trustee dist they had OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, EFTA00235301 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-3

z, where I think that we had told her 21 originally we had heard there were, as an 22 example, sonic loan files or transaction files 23 related to Ponzl deals related to Mr. Epstein, 24 because I remember myself even hearing that going 25 back many, many, many months ago. Pitt 31 1 they had been

cheme. EFTA00286297 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner In RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

good faith and with the bests interests of their clients In mind at all times when in reality, they were acting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzl scheme described herein. EPSTEIN justifiably relied to his detriment on the representations of RRA, and Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and as to h

ne Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

", but were being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass and Intimidate them and Epstein, and to add "star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzl scheme. EFTA00193829 Epstelni. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS,