Epstein Secrets

dge Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." “Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. “We have not yet had ari honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down t

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people .. . who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for c

Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?'' Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down

nd creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people ... who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for

dge Bill Berger, also representing victims,, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal,” "Why was it so important for the government to makethis deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down th

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome, "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people . ,. who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaumj a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the-most for c