Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012179Same page
ndependent third party, AUSA Marie Villafana had already proposed an “attorney representative.” She - had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a “good friend in the Appellate Division.” Ms. Villafana’s account was misleading, as it omitted that this
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012179 →rney representative.” She - had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a “good friend in the Appellate Division.” Ms. Villafana’s account was misleading, as it omitted that this “good friend” was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-s
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012179 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00013808Same page
entative" to an independent third party, AUSA had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good frien
Page: EFTA00013808 →torney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school roomm
Page: EFTA00013808 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
entative" to an independent third party, AUSA had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" wa
ttorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school roommate.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
entative" to an independent third party, AUSA had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms.l iaccount was misleading, as it omitted that this "good frie
torney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms.l iaccount was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school room
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ve" to an independent third party, AUSA Marie had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good frien
torney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school roomm
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
entative" to an independent third party, AUSA had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" wa
ttorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was ha live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-school roommate.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
independent third party, AUSA Marie Villafana had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he bad been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. Villafana's account was misleading, as it omitted that this
torney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he bad been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. Villafana's account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" was her live-in boyfriend, and that Mr. Ocariz was his former law-s
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Humberto Ocariz and the Appellate Division
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON10 w/ Humberto·16 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON10 w/ Humberto·8 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON10 w/ Humberto·8 w/ the
SA
Sanchez
PERSON9 w/ Humberto·7 w/ the
Alice Fisher
PERSON7 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
AUSA Acosta
PERSON6 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
Criminal Division
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Humberto·5 w/ the
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
Department review
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Humberto·5 w/ the
RIGHT TO SELECT LEGAL
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Humberto·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Humberto·4 w/ the
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON4 w/ Humberto·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION2 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON2 w/ Humberto·6 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON4 w/ Humberto·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ Humberto·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON3 w/ Humberto·4 w/ the
HE
Herman
PERSON4 w/ Humberto·3 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON2 w/ Humberto·5 w/ the