Epstein Secrets

costa's letter to Judge Edward B. Davis dated October 25, 2007; Jay l,cfkowitz's letter to dated November 8, 2007; Judge Kenneth Starr's letter to Alice Fisher dated November 28, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated November 29, 2007; and R. Alexander Acosta's letter to Jay Letkowitz d

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland v, United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there i

sions will not be viewed as a breach of the Agreement. We, like you, are eager to achieve finality in this matter. Kenneth W. Starr cc: Honorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Chicago QT1 Hong Kong London Munith New Ycst Sr Francesco Wash

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there is

sions will not be viewed as a breach of the Agreement. We, like you, are eager to achieve finality in this matter. Kenneth W. Starr cc: Honorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Chicago Hong Kong London Munich Now York San Francisco Washingto

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland I, United States 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there

he notification letter until after we are able to discuss this matter with Assistant Attorney General Fisher. Kenneth W. Starr JaillAtz Honorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General , First Assistant U.S. Attorney fL 003 EFTA01718525 12/06/07 'THU 15:25 FAX UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHE

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive." ).r Under these standards, the