Epstein Secrets

it wasn’t any.justice served.” Appendix at 2 (Recarey Depo. 496:1-2). 26. Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Andrew Lourie, in a transmittal letter with the prosecution memo of Assistant U.S'. Attorney Ann Marie Villafana, told Criminal Chief Matthew Menchel: “The state i

from the nature of their institution,’ powers ‘which cannot be dispensed with in a Court, because they are necessary to the. exercise of all others.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991). “There can be no question ofthe inherent power of a court ‘to protect itself, and hence society, as an instru

l, Andrew Lourie to Matthew Menchel, Jeff Sloman, and Marie Villafana, May 22, 2007, 3:11 p.m., FW: Jeffrey Epstein, with e-mail from Lefcourt to Lourie, Villafana, and Lilly Ann Sanchez (May 22, 2007, 2:05 p.m.), attached Atty work-product Suppl. Box 3 P-013873 E-mail Menchel to Villafana and Lo

notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. F

titled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to Andrew Lourie with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman, Matt Menchal, Andrew Lourie, and Marie Villafafia with handwritten attorne

notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. F

Counsel" containing: Work product Deliberative process 6(e) Attorney-Client Privilege ■ 7/13/2007 letter from to with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/2 /2 I from Gerald Lefcourt Matt Menchal , and with handwritten attorney • ■ 6/25/2007 email fro to Matt Menchel and entitle

notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. F

e victim in this case was not criminal, it was not relevant in the sense that it would not have affected his guideline range. The Court notes that Lourie raised both arguments at the hearing on this Motion and vigorously advocated the position that Defendant's sexual conduct with another minor was no

-styled cause prior to sentencing; and 3. In all other respects, the instant Motion (DE 61) be and the same is hereb-, DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 9th day of October, 2007. WILLIAM J. LOCH United States District Judge Copies furnished: All